Andrei Liahovich
build Services

Practical services for operational clarity

These services are designed for small teams that already have a workflow, but the workflow is too manual, scattered, or difficult to control. The goal is not to automate everything. The goal is to clarify the process first, then build only the tool, dashboard, or automation that supports real daily work.

Each service can start as a small diagnostic or fixed-scope pilot.

analytics

Workflow Automation Diagnostic

For: Small teams with manual workflows, unclear bottlenecks, or too many repeated steps.

The process depends on spreadsheets, email, messengers, and memory. It is not clear which parts should be automated first or which tool would fit the team.

Outcome: A clearer process view, quick wins, automation opportunities, and a practical implementation proposal.

Workflow reviewProcess mapBottleneck listQuick-win planImplementation proposal
View service arrow_forward
database

Spreadsheet-to-App / Internal CRM

For: Teams using Excel or Google Sheets as the main system for clients, leads, requests, candidates, or projects.

The spreadsheet has grown into a hidden business system. Statuses, follow-ups, ownership, and reporting are difficult to manage reliably.

Outcome: A lightweight internal tool or CRM-style tracker with structured data, statuses, dashboard views, and handover notes.

Data modelStatus logicInternal interfaceDashboard viewHandover notes
View service arrow_forward
monitoring

Dashboard / Reporting Setup

For: Teams that need better visibility into status, workload, pipeline, risks, delivery, or follow-ups.

Managers spend time collecting updates manually. Reporting is delayed, inconsistent, or spread across several tools.

Outcome: A simple reporting structure, dashboard view, and review logic that makes the key information easier to inspect.

Metrics structureDashboard layoutStatus viewsFiltering logicReporting cadence
View service arrow_forward
group_work

Delivery Operations Audit

For: Startups, IT agencies, and software teams with unclear delivery status or weak operational visibility.

Delivery depends too much on meetings and informal updates. Ownership, risks, resource planning, and reporting are not visible enough.

Outcome: A structured review of current delivery operations, visibility gaps, bottlenecks, risks, and a stabilization plan.

Process reviewVisibility gapsRisk listReporting recommendationsStabilization plan
View service arrow_forward
rocket_launch

MVP Delivery Setup

For: Founders and small product teams preparing to build or restart an MVP.

The product idea exists, but scope, assumptions, risks, backlog, and execution rhythm are not clear enough.

Outcome: A practical MVP delivery structure: scope, backlog outline, assumptions, risks, cadence, and first tracking setup.

MVP scopeBacklog outlineAssumption listRisk listDelivery cadence
View service arrow_forward

How the work usually runs

1

Clarify the workflow

We identify users, data, statuses, ownership, bottlenecks, and the output the team actually needs.

2

Define the first version

The first version is kept focused — one workflow, one clear output, and limited implementation scope.

3

Build or document

Depending on the service, the output may be a diagnostic report, dashboard, tracker, CRM, or setup plan.

4

Test against usage

The result is reviewed against real daily work, not only against a feature checklist.

5

Handover and next steps

You receive notes, structure, and recommendations for refinement or further automation.

Ready to act?

Start with a focused request

Describe the process, current tools, and what is difficult to control. I will suggest whether a diagnostic, dashboard, tracker, or delivery setup is the right starting point.